Target America slammed little girls’ ‘revealing’ clothes

An American woman has criticized a major retailer for saying that young girls’ clothes are often “tighter” and “shorter” than clothes sold to boys.

A woman has slammed Target in the US for selling boys’ and girls’ clothes that are drastically different in design and style.

Meredith Alston, a mother of three from Maryland in the United States, took to ICT Tac to explain how she noticed that the items sold in the girls’ section were much less “practical” or “functional” than what was offered in the boys’ section.

She also claimed that girls’ clothes at the major US retailer are often “tighter” and “shorter” than boys’ clothes.

Although it shares the same name and logo, Target Australia has no connection with Target Corporation in America.

“Target, if you’re listening, I have to ask you a question. My daughter needed new pants for school. So in the girls section we [found] those cute stretchy, airy, thin leggings,” she began one of her now-viral clips from March.

The mother held up skinny girls’ navy blue pants as she continued her rant.

“Now let’s look at what the boys have. They’re durable, they have an adjustable drawstring, and they have reinforced knees so they don’t fall apart every month,” she said, showing off a looser pair of boys’ cargo pants.

In another clip she shared on Wednesday, Meredith compared a pair of navy boys’ shorts to a pair of colorfully striped girls’ shorts.

“These are for the same age group, average height, seven to eight,” she said, while holding the two different pairs.

“I don’t need to tell you which pair was designed for girls and which was designed for boys.

“Just look at the length, the tiny little pockets, like the girls don’t have shit they want to put in their pockets, like they don’t collect things.

“It’s important because who’s going to get dressed up and be told their shorts are too short? And don’t tell me to just shop in the boys section, that’s not what it’s about.

Meredith explained that the shorts were the most comparable things she could find.

“Look how many pockets and extra fabric the boys’ shorts have compared to the girls – and yet the boys are somehow cheaper.”

She claimed the toddler section is the same, adding that longer boys’ shorts with pockets are $6, compared to “those $8 shorts that barely work for girls.”

She claimed she had trouble finding a single pair of pants in the girls’ section that came with extra fabric in the knees, as the boys’ pants did.

“I didn’t see any pants or leggings in the girls section that had reinforced knees. They have what they call a ‘durable knee’ made of ‘durable cotton’ which is only 95% cotton and 5% spandex,” she said in a separate clip.

Meredith’s video series has since sparked huge debate, and while many agreed with her, others were less supportive.

“It’s true. My daughters wear size 3-6 in boys and 12 months in girls. Make that make sense,” one woman wrote.

“Thank you, that’s so blatantly sexist,” said another.

One woman wrote that she now understands why her son has never ruined pants while her daughter ‘gets all her knees blown’, and Meredith replied: ‘It’s because they’re so badly made too If they fall once, they will tear!

Others defended the American brand and encouraged the mother to shop in the boys department if she had a “problem with the girl’s pants”.

“Literally no one stopping you,” one person wrote.

“Your daughter can wear these same boys pants and they look super cute,” another wrote while a third added that it would “solve her problem.”

But Meredith was quick to hit back, saying it was a much bigger “problem.”

“What really concerns me is the severity of the consequences that girls face for their clothes,” she said.

“Children, mostly girls, continue to be removed from their classrooms for violating their school’s dress code policies.

“Girls face barriers to accessing clothing that is functional, durable, practical, and consistent with their school’s dress code policies.”

She also slammed other mums who have since commented telling her to “stop complaining”.

She said they “may not have had to consider the consequences their children might face because of the shorts they wear.”

“But the consequences my daughters face are at least worth talking about,” she continued in another clip.

“Our girls have the right to respect, dignity and safety, and to be treated like children.

“And don’t worry, no one is saying that anyone is more or less entitled to any of these things.

“We would just appreciate clothes for us and our kids that are designed to perform as well as clothes designed for boys and men.

“You don’t have to be a parent to care about this issue, and you certainly don’t have to have a daughter to know that what women wear is used as a weapon against them,” he said. she declared.

News.com.au has contacted Target America for comment.

Originally published as Target America slammed the ‘revealing’ girls’ clothes


Source link

Comments are closed.